Re: locked reads for atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: locked reads for atomics
Date
Msg-id f7519ac5437f1e9f1bd1bb5a4f30fad42eaa6ad7.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: locked reads for atomics  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: locked reads for atomics
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 12:58 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> There's some immediate use for reads/writes with barrier semantics -

Is this mainly a convenience for safety/readability? Or is it faster in
some cases than doing an atomic access with separate memory barriers?

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser