Thanks for looking.
On 2018/11/07 12:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> ISTM patch 0004 is impossible to review just because of size -- I
> suppose the bulk of it is just code that moves from one file to another,
> but that there are also code changes in it. Maybe it would be better to
> split it so that one patch moves the code to the new files without
> changing it, then another patch does the actual functional changes? If
> git shows the first half as a rename, it's easier to be confident about
> it.
Okay, will post a new version structured that way shortly.
Thanks,
Amit
