Re: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
Date
Msg-id f6fbd589-5c41-5827-6396-e9591229ef25@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-general
On 06/13/2018 09:44 AM, bend@linux4ms.net wrote:
> Analyze the DB exactly how?

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-analyze.html

> 
> I did run a reindexdb after migration to no affect.
> 
> Yeah the PLANS are a big difference ....
> 
> Ben Duncan - Business Network Solutions, Inc. 336 Elton Road Jackson MS, 
> 39212
> "Never attribute to malice, that which can be adequately explained by 
> stupidity"
> - Hanlon's Razor
> 
> 
>     -------- Original Message --------
>     Subject: Re: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
>     From: Don Seiler <don@seiler.us <mailto:don@seiler.us>>
>     Date: Wed, June 13, 2018 11:24 am
>     To: bend@linux4ms.net <mailto:bend@linux4ms.net>
>     Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>     <mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org>>
> 
>     On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:16 AM, <bend@linux4ms.net
>     <mailto:bend@linux4ms.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
>         Can anyoen explain WHY there is such a big difference? Is it the
>         SQL statement or a bug in the pgdump ?
> 
> 
>     Did you analyze the database after upgrading? Or at least the tables
>     in question? Those are very different plans.
> 
>     -- 
>     Don Seiler
>     www.seiler.us <http://www.seiler.us>
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Don Seiler
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues on 9.5 to 9.6 Upgrade.
Next
From: Łukasz Jarych
Date:
Subject: Using GIT to caught delta between database versions