Re: sequences and pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: sequences and pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id f6d8acf4-448b-6c0c-8b2a-ad7180adb2b6@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sequences and pg_upgrade  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/2/16 2:34 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I had a look at those fresh patches, and 0001 looks like a good thing.
> This makes the separation between sequences and table data dump
> cleaner. I ran some tests with pg_upgrade and 0002, and things are
> clear. And +1 for the way done in the patch, aka no options of pg_dump
> exposed to user, still keep the option tracking as a separate value.

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress