Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id f6852374-022c-29ec-4828-ae2c8a4e4668@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql: SQL-standard function body  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
List pgsql-committers
On 12.04.21 21:00, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>>> Here is an improved patch, which treats END in the same fashion
>>> (not properly indented for readability).
>>
>> Thanks, I took another look at this and augmented your change with a
>> change that tracks whether the statement starts with CREATE [OR REPLACE]
>> {FUNCTION|PROCEDURE}.  That should make it pretty safe.  What do you think?
> 
> Thanks, that is fine with me and more than I asked for.
> That should definitely exclude all false positive matches.

committed




pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pgsql: psql: Refine lexing of BEGIN...END blocks in CREATE FUNCTION sta
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Use SIGURG rather than SIGUSR1 for latches.