On Fri, 2026-07-10 at 12:25 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> Perhaps one could fix this by having REASSIGN OWNED process only
> pg_subscription rows where subdbid is the current database.
That was my first thought, as well. I will look into it.
> I'm nervous that we'll have other reasons to regret letting a shared
> object
> depend on a non-shared object, but I've not come up with anything
> else
> concrete.
That's a reasonable concern. We discussed it here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LyHvRoNzZPpPQqo7a%3D5Wov8F-7%2BKDduy-9ymcRm%3DBatg%40mail.gmail.com
Though the root of the problem might be that pg_subscription is shared
in the first place.
Perhaps we should just not record the dependency on the foreign server
at all, and if someone drops it, then the drop succeeds and the
connection fails later. That would be more like what would happen if
you revoke privileges, which also isn't tracked by the dependency
mechanism but has a similar result.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
