Re: alter table docs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: alter table docs
Date
Msg-id f5e925de-5ef6-59a5-e26f-1668ff25562b@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to alter table docs  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: alter table docs  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 07/30/2018 09:57 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> I was just looking up alter table add constraint syntax under 
> "current(10)" and we get
> 
>          ADD /table_constraint/ [ NOT VALID ]
>          ADD /table_constraint_using_index/
> 
> There is a description below for the using_index version but none for 
> the plain version.  There is a block for the plain version on the CREATE 

I see one:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-altertable.html

"ADD table_constraint [ NOT VALID ]

     This form adds a new constraint to a table using the same syntax as 
CREATE TABLE, plus the option NOT VALID, which is currently only allowed 
for foreign key and CHECK constraints. If the constraint is marked NOT 
VALID, the potentially-lengthy initial check to verify that all rows in 
the table satisfy the constraint is skipped. The constraint will still 
be enforced against subsequent inserts or updates (that is, they'll fail 
unless there is a matching row in the referenced table, in the case of 
foreign keys; and they'll fail unless the new row matches the specified 
check constraints). But the database will not assume that the constraint 
holds for all rows in the table, until it is validated by using the 
VALIDATE CONSTRAINT option.
"

> TABLE page. Should it not also appear in the ALTER TABLE page?
> 
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql 10.4 installation issues on Ubuntu 14.05
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Restore relhaspkey in PostgreSQL Version 11 Beta