Re: anonymous unions (C11) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Date
Msg-id f5e05c40-2737-4fc1-9b96-a81bd2422658@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: anonymous unions (C11)  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 19.01.26 22:10, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Sep-23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
>> Here is another patch set to sprinkle some C11 features around the
>> code.  My aim is to make a little bit of use of several C11 features
>> as examples and encouragement for future code, and to test compilers
>> (although we're not yet at the point where this should really stress
>> any compiler).
> 
> I was going over patch [1] today and came across the union in
> relopt_value.  Vaguely remembering this thread, I patched it out
> (attached) ... and now that I come here to post it, I realize that it's
> probably identical to your patch 0009 here.
> 
> Would you push it or can I?

Go ahead please.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication