Tom Lane wrote:
> > I don't see how we can get by without some kind of versioning here.
> > It's probably too late to do that for v17,
>
> Why? If we agree that that's the way forward, we could certainly
> stick some collversion other than "1" into pg_c_utf8's pg_collation
> entry. There's already been one v17 catversion bump since beta2
> (716bd12d2), so another one is basically free.
pg_collation.collversion has been used so far for the sort part
of the collations.
For the ctype part:
postgres=# select unicode_version();
unicode_version
-----------------
15.1
(1 row)
postgres=# select icu_unicode_version ();
icu_unicode_version
---------------------
14.0
(1 row)
Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
https://postgresql.verite.pro/
Twitter: @DanielVerite
