Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6! - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!
Date
Msg-id f5ae9426-8df2-bb6c-9aba-77f30ead8c64@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!  ("Igal @ Lucee.org" <igal@lucee.org>)
List pgsql-general
On 10/17/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
>> Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed when
>> moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
> It's entirely possible you'll need *less*, as you'll be absorbing the
> benefit of several years' worth of performance improvements.  But this
> is such a workload-dependent thing that there's no general answer.

XML stored in blobs (not sure whether text or bytea) and b-tree indexes.

-- 
World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurent Laborde
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Log storage
Next
From: "Igal @ Lucee.org"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Finally upgrading to 9.6!