Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Date
Msg-id f561fe8b-cc86-29db-af26-34b51e284b30@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/26/17 2:05 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I do not think it can be right to rename the directory and not
> anything else.

I think this is the root of the confusion.

A lot of people apparently consented to renaming pg_xlog with the
understanding that that's it, whereas other people understood it as
consensus for renaming everything.

You really have (at least) three options here:

1. Rename nothing
2. Rename directory only
3. Rename everything

and you need to count the votes of each pair separately.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter van Hardenberg
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size