On 20/11/2020 08:31, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:47:51AM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Yeah, I believe it's always been like that. Yeah, arguably it should be
>> backpatched. I felt conservative and didn't backpatch, but feel free to do
>> it if you think it should be.
>
> +1 for a backpatch. The difference in runtime for EXPLAIN in this case
> is quite something.
That's two votes for backpatching. Ok, I'll go do it.
- Heikki
