Re: adding partitioned tables to publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date
Msg-id f4a265b3-e1e4-4367-c7db-57fac0a26545@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-04-08 07:45, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:22 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:01 PM Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> The descriptions of the new fields in RelationSyncEntry don't seem to
>>> match the code accurately, or at least it's confusing.
>>> replicate_as_relid is always filled in with an ancestor, even if
>>> pubviaroot is not set.
>>
>> Given this confusion, I have changed how replicate_as_relid works so
>> that it's now always set -- if different from the relation's own OID,
>> the code for "publishing via root" kicks in in various places.
>>
>>> I think the pubviaroot field is actually not necessary.  We only need
>>> replicate_as_relid.
>>
>> Looking through the code, I agree.  I guess I only kept it around to
>> go with pubupdate, etc.
> 
> Think I broke truncate replication with this.  Fixed in the attached
> updated patch.

All committed.

Thank you and everyone very much for working on this.  I'm very happy 
that these two features from PG10 have finally met. :)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: recovery_target_action=pause with confusing hint
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RUM Postgres 13 patch