On Wed, 2026-03-11 at 17:59 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> That leaves some awkwardness, but I don't immediately see a cleaner
> way
> to do it. Suggestions welcome.
I did see a way to avoid the volatile entirely, it just needs a
redundant MemoryContextSwtichTo(). I think this is cleaner overall,
attached.
Regards,
Jeff Davis