Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Achilleas Mantzios
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id f3fe46fe-f45d-1fb2-83be-fba70fe00cdd@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
List pgsql-general
On 5/6/20 5:19 μ.μ., Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Achilleas Mantzios schrieb am 05.06.2020 um 14:05:
>>> Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part name, something
>>> sqlserver excels at.
>> Maybe because SQL server does not have real databases but schemas instead ?
>> This sucks security wise.
> That is wrong.
>
> SQL Server has both: databases and schemas and it allows for standard compliant catalog.schema.table references.
>
> I think you are confusing that with MySQL where a schema and a database are the same thing
I think that you are confusing what you think I am confusing. I am talking about our MS SQL installation here at work.
Notdone by me anyways I am the pgsql guy, but still do most of the query stuff 
 
in ms sql as well.
I wrote already that my comment was far fetched in a subsequent email.
>
>


-- 
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible improvement
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: Binary encoding of TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE