Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported
Date
Msg-id f3a05791-1bee-95ae-6221-85323495ba31@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 4/26/18 05:03, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/04/26 13:01, David Rowley wrote:
>> The attached small patch removes the mention that partitioned tables
>> cannot have foreign keys defined on them.
>>
>> This has been supported since 3de241db
> 
> I noticed also that the item regarding row triggers might be obsolete as
> of 86f575948c7, thanks again to Alvaro!  So, I updated your patch to take
> care of that.

committed both

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48?