Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()
Date
Msg-id f373e4e0-bdc8-bca8-e0e6-cbcaa2e64bdc@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 6/4/20 5:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-28, Joe Conway wrote:
>
>> I backpatched and pushed the changes to the repeat() function. Any other
>> opinions regarding backpatch of the unlikely() addition to CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()?
>
> We don't use unlikely() in 9.6 at all, so I would stop that backpatching
> at 10 anyhow.  (We did backpatch unlikely()'s definition afterwards.)


Correct you are -- thanks for the heads up! Pushed to REL_10_STABLE and later.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)