Re: XID wraparound in 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Anj Adu
Subject Re: XID wraparound in 8.4
Date
Msg-id f2fd819a0910131451y4e433470q35107f1248e7fef2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XID wraparound in 8.4  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: XID wraparound in 8.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Assuming that autovacuum is off in 8,2 and upwards versions, would I
still have to do a database-wide vacuumdb  OR would vacuuming
individual tables that are permanent be sufficient to take care of XID
wraparound?

2009/8/11 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
> Anj Adu escribió:
>> Reason we dont turn on autovacuum is that we are a "high-volume"
>> insert shop with minimal updates..We have about 200 million inserts
>> and a few thousand updates only. Most tables are partitions and get
>> dropped as part of the purge. Hence..autovacuum is a waste of
>> resources. However...the XID issue will force the need for an
>> autovacuum at some point..hence we do it as a one-off occasionally.
>
> Hmm, in 8.2 you won't need to vacuum any tables that you drop or
> truncate.  Only permanent tables will need to be vacuumed once in a
> while.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Michael Graziano
Date:
Subject: Re: Warm standby questions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: XID wraparound in 8.4