Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7
Date
Msg-id f249b1c3-a561-d5b5-1e6a-2c5d826f1451@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7  (Nicola Contu <nicola.contu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 12/04/2017 04:57 PM, Nicola Contu wrote:
> No I did not run a vacuum analyze. Do you want me to try with that first?
> 
> @Tomas:
> Talking abut power management, I changed the profile for tuned-adm
> to latency-performance instead of balanced (that is the default)
> 
> that is increasing performances for now and they are similar to centos 6.9.
> 
> Time: 2.121 ms
> Time: 2.026 ms
> Time: 1.664 ms
> Time: 1.749 ms
> Time: 1.656 ms
> Time: 1.675 ms
> 
> Do you think this can be easily done in production as well? 
> 

How am I supposed to know? Not only that depends on your internal
deployment policies, but it's also much more a CentOS/RedHat question
than PostgreSQL.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: attempting to retrieve column names from information schema fails.
Next
From: "Day, David"
Date:
Subject: RE: attempting to retrieve column names from information schemafails.