Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Verite
Subject Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date
Msg-id f2251246-03b6-4d34-a5cc-2a0e79fe17db@mm
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
    Pavel Stehule wrote:

> > So not using \crosstab is deliberate; it's to prevent confusion with
> > the server-side function.
>
> I don't afraid about this - crosstab is a function in extension. Psql
> backslash commands living in different worlds.

Sure, but the confusion would be assuming that \crosstab is some sort
of frontend for crosstab() queries,  like for example \copy is a frontend
for COPY.
That mistake seems plausible if the same name is reused, and much less
plausible otherwise.


Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kouhei Kaigai
Date:
Subject: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Bug in numeric multiplication