[GENERAL] Major Version Upgradation from 9.4 to 9.6 in Replication Environment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Amee Sankhesara - Quipment India
Subject [GENERAL] Major Version Upgradation from 9.4 to 9.6 in Replication Environment
Date
Msg-id f1bf7cbba92a47b4b7df98b776e5b713@Strand.quipment.local
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Major Version Upgradation from 9.4 to 9.6 in Replication Environment  (Jov <amutu@amutu.com>)
List pgsql-general

Quipment Logo

Hello,

 

We have a windows setup where we have 2 node primary-slave setup which comprises Async Replication + Log Shipping on slave.

 

Now we want to upgrade it from 9.4 to 9.6 version.

 

Do we need to upgrade slave to 9.6, upgrade master to 9.6 and setup replication again from scratch?

 

What are the best possible ways available to upgrade slave and master without setting up replication again?

 

Our Setup - WINDOWS SERVER 2012 , PostgreSQL 9.4.7 on primary and slave

Objective - To Upgrade Master and Slave from 9.4 to 9.6

 

Thanks,

Amee Sankhesara
Database Developer

R&D .Net Department

T / +91 (0) 94295 45266
amee.sankhesara@ / www.quipment.in

 

QTwee Group BV
KvK Arnhem 60858001
BTW NL854090721B01
mail@ / www.quipment.nl

Hoofdkantoor Nijmegen
Kerkenbos 1236 C
6546 BE Nijmegen

Tel.

+31 (0)24 372 47 00

Fax.

+31 (0)24 372 47 07

Quipment India
903-904 Landmark,
Beside Titanium City Centre,
Anandnagar Road, 100ft Ring Road,
Ahmedabad
Gujarat - 380015 - India
Tel. +91 (0) 79 4009 7847

Disclaimer

This e-mail message (including any attachment) is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.

 

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Perfomance of IN-clause with many elements and possible solutions
Next
From: Dmitry Lazurkin
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Perfomance of IN-clause with many elements and possiblesolutions