On 2/7/18 00:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think what I had meant to write was something like
>>
>> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66))
>>
>> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did.
>
> If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the
> formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that
> ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics.
Committed with the separate entries.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
