On 9/17/19 10:00 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 09/17/19 21:13, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
>> to), which describes being able to use "[0-9]+;" and "[0-9a-fA-F]+;"
>
> Er, that is, "[0-9]+;" and "[0-9a-fA-F]+;" (with x for the hex case).
Correct, I missed the "x".
Thanks,
Jonathan