On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM,
<david@lang.hm> wrote:
if you haven't done a vaccum analyse on either installation then postgres' idea of what sort of data is in the database is unpredictable, and as a result it's not surprising that the two systems guess differently about what sort of plan is going to be most efficiant.
try doing vaccum analyse on both databases and see what the results are.
David Lang
These are the results with vacuum analyze:
8.2.12: 624.366 ms
8.3.3: 1273.601 ms