Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch?
Date
Msg-id f05c7bbe19606ac46cd7e9bf664a03dd
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
>
> hotz@jpl.nasa.gov said:
> :- For those dismayed by the number of things caught just after release,
> :- let me say that it's just human nature.
>
> And let me say that when pgsql purifys ``clean'' damn near all the
> bugs will be gone.  (Spoken like a true purify-bigot... ;-)
>
> I agree with the sentiment that we need a ``pgsql-stable'' branch,
> and that new features should go into some other version.

We don't want to go down that road again.  Two branches is very hard to
manage.  It takes lots of people's time.

No one really is jumping to add new features, so we have time to clean
up 6.1.

- --
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

------------------------------

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.1 jumbo patch?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] \dt and disk access