Re: UPGRADATION TO 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ben Trewern
Subject Re: UPGRADATION TO 8.1
Date
Msg-id etluid$14p5$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to UPGRADATION TO 8.1  (Mageshwaran <j_mageshwaran@sifycorp.com>)
Responses Re: UPGRADATION TO 8.1  (Walter Vaughan <wvaughan@steelerubber.com>)
Re: UPGRADATION TO 8.1  ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
So what's he meant to do?  Write a longer question just so the mandatory
disclamer that his company attaches to his e-mail takes up a lower
percentage of his e-mail?  (or should he not ask the question at all?)

Regards,

Ben

>
> Btw, I personally find a payload/noise ratio of 1/6 atrocious,
> and not very kind regarding the mailing-list.
>
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Shoaib Mir"
Date:
Subject: Re: Client/Server [max connections]
Next
From: "Alain Roger"
Date:
Subject: Stored Procedure / function and their result