Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul Ramsey
Subject Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
Date
Msg-id etPan.55afecc8.140e0f76.129ae@Crane.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support
List pgsql-hackers
On July 22, 2015 at 12:15:14 PM, Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
It doesn't seem that unlikely that somebody does an ALTER SERVER OPTIONS 
SET .. to add an extension to be shippable while connections are already 
using the fdw. It'll be confusing if some clients are fast and some 
others are really slow. 

This seems more likely than anyone mucking around with extension stuff (adding new functions (and working with FDW in production at the same time?)) or adding/dropping whole extensions (you’ll have more problems than a stale cache, whole columns will disappear if you "DROP EXTENSION postgis CASCADE"), and has the added benefit of not needing me to muck into core stuff for my silly feature.

I’ll have a look at doing invalidation for the case of changes to the FDW wrappers and servers.

P. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Eliminating CREATE INDEX comparator TID tie-breaker overhead
Next
From: Adam Brightwell
Date:
Subject: Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore