Re: Scalability - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill
Subject Re: Scalability
Date
Msg-id ei11r2$22vo$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Scalability  ("Bill" <postgresql@dbginc.com>)
Responses Re: Scalability  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Joshua D. Drake" wrote:

> Bill wrote:
> > I am new to PostgreSQL and just beginning to learn the product. I
> > will probrobably be using it exclusively on Windows.
> >
> > I was surprised to learn that PostgreSQL creates a new process for
> > each connection. Doesn't this severely limit its scalability by
> > consuming resources rapidly on the server as the number of user
> > increases?
>
> The Windows version is not anywhere near as scalable as the unix
> versions. Depending on your hardware you will top out a Windows
> installation about about 350-400 connections. You can get more out of
> Windows by modifying the registry but I am unsure of how far it will
> go.
>
> I have Linux installations that happily hum along with 2000-5000
> connections.
>
> So in answer to your question, in general -- no the process
> methodology we use does not limit scalability and it makes our code
> base much simpler that the  equivalent threading model.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake

Thanks. How much memory does PostgreSQL consume with 2000 connections?

Which Linux distribution do you prefer?

--
.Bill.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: CUBE, ROLLUP, GROUPING SETS?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Scalability