Re: index-only scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: index-only scans
Date
Msg-id efc55fe88ef91833d409fff0b8170fa9@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to index-only scans  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: index-only scans
Re: index-only scans
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> 1. The way that nodeIndexscan.c builds up the faux heap tuple is
> perhaps susceptible to improvement.  I thought about building a
> virtual tuple, but then what do I do with an OID column, if I have
> one?  Or maybe this should be done some other way altogether.

Maybe it's time to finally remove the been-deprecated-for-a-while OIDs?

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201108111654
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk5EQiEACgkQvJuQZxSWSsglcQCeKsLRvd958M5QJ8YC8aNqr/Ku
11QAn1Iwaz9GuGVOB28orAITCsSX4MOo
=JMag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce WAL logging of INSERT SELECT
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: index-only scans