On 02.04.2020 2:46, Tom Lane wrote:
Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
[ latest version of ltree syntax extension ]
This is going to need another rebase after all the other ltree hacking
that just got done. However, I did include 0001 (use a switch) in
the commit I just pushed, so you don't need to worry about that.
regards, tom lane
Rebased patch attached.
I’m not sure whether it's worth to introduce one LTREE_TOK_SPECIAL for
the whole set of special characters, and still check them with t_iseq().
--
Nikita Glukhov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
