Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date
Msg-id ef44619f-a25b-41e5-be87-d3971ff8c1d3@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
List pgsql-hackers
On 15.12.25 08:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> So their gettext handles PRIu64 and PRIu32 and nothing else.
> 
> What to do now?  I could revert 8c498479d and followups, but
> I sure don't want to.  A stopgap measure to make the farm look
> green would be to add a variant expected-file that accepts
> this output, but yech.  Thoughts?

I think that means that that gettext implementation is not currently 
supportable.  So either we revert our PRI* use except those two 
(unlikely), or those buildfarm members should disable NLS.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix severe performance regression with gettext 0.20+ on Windows
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs