On 24.11.21 05:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 08:31, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Regarding 0001, I find the existing code a bit more self-documenting
>>> if we keep those checks flagInhAttrs() and guessConstraintInheritance().
>>> So I would rather leave these.
>> In that case, the existing check in guessConstraintInheritance() seems
>> wrong, because it doesn't check for RELKIND_MATVIEW. Should we fix that?
>> It's dead code either way, but if the code isn't exercises, then these kinds
>> of inconsistency come about.
> Yeah, this one could be added. Perhaps that comes down to one's taste
> at the end, but I would add it.
Ok, I have committed adding the missing relkind, as you suggest. Patch
v3-0001 is therefore obsolete.
