Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date
Msg-id edeb405c-b9f8-4e4b-aeee-e40e799be86f@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl>)
Responses Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
List pgsql-hackers
On 18.02.25 09:34, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 12:43, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me@jeltef.nl> wrote:
>> Attached is a rebased patchset of my previous proposal, including a
>> few changes that Michael preferred:
> 
> Rebased again. (got notified because of the new commitfest rebase emails)
> 
> The first patch should be trivial to commit at least as it's just cleanup.

I think the additions to typedefs.list are useless.  Since nothing 
actually uses these types, the collection on the buildfarm won't find 
any uses of them and thus won't include it in its list, and then the 
next update from the buildfarm will overwrite your changes.

You might as well just remove the type definitions (but keep the enum 
declarations).




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Script for determining code coverage of functions listed in pg_proc.dat
Next
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postmaster crashed during start