On 09/20/2017 07:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 09/20/2017 06:13 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Those are around for some time, see here:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTkW=b_1JVvYWd_G0WrKOT+4uFQjGGrv8osQbUZzXGXdA@mail.gmail.com
>>> But there has been no actual agreement about how to fix them..
>> Oh. Missed that.
>> My solution was going to be slightly different. I was going to enclose
>> the #ifdef'd code in a bare block and move the rte declaration inside
>> that block.
> Of the various solutions proposed in the previous thread, I think the
> most salable alternative is probably ilmari's: get rid of the variable
> and write the assert like
>
> Assert(planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY);
>
> That's a pretty minimal change and it doesn't add any cycles to the
> non-Assert case.
>
>
I can live with that. Will do.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
