Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Date
Msg-id eb8edbf8-30ad-4cdb-81f7-4b3cc6f39f7c@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/20/23 23:54, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 03:31:20PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> 
>> I still wonder if we need "base backup" in the messages? That sort of
>> implies (at least to me) you used pg_basebackup but that may not be the
>> case.
> 
> Or just s/base backup/backup/?

That's what I meant but did not explain very well.

Regards,
-David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Next
From: Alena Rybakina
Date:
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes