Re: famous multi-process architectures - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: famous multi-process architectures
Date
Msg-id eab742367170e8229607155f598d77bf@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to famous multi-process architectures  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Responses Re: famous multi-process architectures
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> "Google got inspired by Postgres: they use the same
>  multi-process architecture for their browser as Postgres
>  already features for many years. Simply because it
>  provides better crash-safety than threaded applications."

That's a heck of a stretch to say they were "inspired" by
Postgres. A multi-process model is hardly a unique development
of Postgres, and it's not like we don't still have crash problems:

"process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory"
"terminating connection because of crash of another server process"

I suspect Chrome doesn't have the same shared memory requirements
that a database does, of course.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809041014
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAki/7dUACgkQvJuQZxSWSshiAACg6cYg8GkpoNmTIV1/edxEdB0p
AkUAn2HMQPntdqjQARWA4Z9pKef7aPwj
=mpK2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: famous multi-process architectures
Next
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: famous multi-process architectures