Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan
Date
Msg-id ea747ed1-a1cb-7bdc-1b60-efd77b9cf99d@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.07.18 11:12, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>     This appears to be the patch of record in this thread.  I think there is
>     general desire for adding a setting like this, and the implementation is
>     simple enough.
> 
>     One change perhaps: How about naming the default setting "auto" instead
>     of "default".  That makes it clearer what it does.
> 
> 
> I changed "default" to "auto"
> 
> updated patch attached

committed with some editing

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: psql tab completion for SELECT
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Finding database for pg_upgrade missing library