Foreign Key question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dave Clarke
Subject Foreign Key question
Date
Msg-id ea6dff71-f0d1-4f10-826a-8aeabd6a16ec@n8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Foreign Key question
Re: Foreign Key question
List pgsql-general
Hello

I have a table that I'm trying to refactor and I'm by no means a SQL
expert (apologies if I'm posting to the wrong group). The table in
question has a column that allows NULLs. I want to move that column
into a separate table and set up a FK reference back to the original
table. My question is whether this is the correct way to refactor this
table.

Original table (other columns elided)

PurchaseOrder
---------------------
POType
PONum
ServiceProviderNum
WorkOrderRef (NULLs allowed)

PK: POType + PONum
Candidate Key: PONum + ServiceProviderNum

Proposed structure

PurchaseOrder
---------------------
POType
PONum
ServiceProviderNum

PK: PONum + ServiceProviderNum

WorkOrder
---------------
PONum
ServiceProviderNum
WorkOrderRef (NULLs not allowed)

PK: PONum + ServiceProviderNum
FK: PurchaseOrder( PONum + ServiceProviderNum)

Does that make sense? My intention is to be able to join PurchaseOrder
and WorkOrder to get the set of PurchaseOrder's that have been
assigned WorkOrderRef's. As I understand it, FK's are generally used
for 1 to many relationships where as this is expressing a 1 to 1
relationship.

I would be very grateful for any assistance with this. Thanks, Dave

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Bailey
Date:
Subject: Re: xml to table (as oppose to table to xml)
Next
From: Sven W
Date:
Subject: pl/pgsql FOUND variables and RULES