Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests take a long time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests take a long time
Date
Msg-id e917b1d7-56af-c5ab-3a2a-b52bbadc19b2@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests take a long time  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests take a long time  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

On 04/12/2017 08:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 04/12/2017 01:27 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> BTW, I suggest adding --timer to our default PROVE_FLAGS, so we can
>> collect more data from the buildfarm on what takes a while. Sample
>> output:
>>
>
> I'll add that to the commandline the buildfarm uses in the upcoming release.
>


See
<https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=nightjar&dt=2017-04-12%2013%3A54%3A22>

One thing I noticed was this
   [10:02:40] t/001_basic.pl ......... ok      320 ms   [10:02:59] t/002_pg_dump.pl ....... ok    19441 ms   [10:03:47]
t/010_dump_connstr.pl.. ok    47430 ms
 

Why does the last test set take 47s?

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem