Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Date
Msg-id e904a944-fc12-aeab-c709-7771cb9c5a17@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 14/08/18 22:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> What should we do with the use of the keyword PROCEDURE in the CREATE
>> OPERATOR and CREATE TRIGGER syntaxes?
> 
> We're kinda stuck with that.  We could add FUNCTION as a preferred
> synonym, perhaps, but I doubt that'd really be worth the trouble.

If someone were to waste their time doing it, would we want FUNCTION or
ROUTINE?
-- 
Vik Fearing                                          +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect error handling for two-phase state files resulting indata loss
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan