Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Date
Msg-id e8fdcee5-bfef-7707-a704-35bac35e5a11@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2020-05-19 09:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While digging into my backlog, I have found this message from Peter E
> mentioning about $subject:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e6aac026-174c-9952-689f-6bee76f9ab68@2ndquadrant.com
> 
> It seems to me that it would be a good idea to make those checks more
> consistent, and attached is a patch.

That thread didn't resolve why check_canonical_path() is necessary 
there.  Maybe the existing uses could be removed?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizer docs typos
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions