Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Date
Msg-id e8d867f7-5214-6c93-d53e-63df59e4ce63@timescale.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/3/22 11:41, Andres Freund wrote:
> What patches are we concretely talking about?>
> My impression is that a lot of the patches floating from CF to CF have gotten
> sceptical feedback and at best a minor amount of work to address that has been
> done.

- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/2482/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3338/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3181/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/2918/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/2710/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/2266/ (this one was particularly
miscommunicated during the first RwF)
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/2218/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3256/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3310/
- https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3050/

Looking though, some of those have received skeptical feedback as you
say, but certainly not all; not even a majority IMO. (Even if they'd all
received skeptical feedback, if the author replies in good faith and is
met with silence for months, we need to not keep stringing them along.)

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Smoothing the subtrans performance catastrophe