On 11/10/20 9:24 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 10/11/20, Daniele Varrazzo (daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
>> version number?
>
> Personally I think the "3" in "psycopg3" is clearer than simply
> "psycopg" in relation to this being an evolution of the psycopg2
> package.
And for me, a lone 3 at the end of a package name means Python 3 version.
Maybe skip the 3 and go straight to 4?
--
~Ethan~
