Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id e84013b6-b890-1c4c-2b82-eca185a2197c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
This patch set was not updated for the 2018-07 commitfest, so moved to -09.


On 09.03.18 17:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think this patch is not going to be ready for PG11.
> 
> - It depends on some work in the thread "logical decoding of two-phase
> transactions", which is still in progress.
> 
> - Various details in the logical_work_mem patch (0001) are unresolved.
> 
> - This being partially a performance feature, we haven't seen any
> performance tests (e.g., which settings result in which latencies under
> which workloads).
> 
> That said, the feature seems useful and desirable, and the
> implementation makes sense.  There are documentation and tests.  But
> there is a significant amount of design and coding work still necessary.
> 
> Attached is a fixup patch that I needed to make it compile.
> 
> The last two patches in your series (0008, 0009) are labeled as bug
> fixes.  Would you like to argue that they should be applied
> independently of the rest of the feature?
> 


-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Push down Aggregates below joins
Next
From: Sergei Kornilov
Date:
Subject: Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API