On 2019-10-10 10:03, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:08:37AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here is my proposed patch to adjust this.
>
> Looks fine to me reading through. I think that you are right to not
> change the descriptions in build_server_final_message(), as that's
> described similarly in RFC 5802.
committed
> By renaming scram_build_verifier()
> to scram_build_secret() you are going to break one of my in-house
> extensions. I am using it to register for a user SCRAM veri^D^D^D^D
> secrets with custom iteration and salt length :)
OK, that should be easy to work around with an #ifdef or two.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
