Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Carl Youngblood
Subject Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
Date
Msg-id e5ed7b690608151147o7f65132do3b9d301f8b2ebc65@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding
List pgsql-performance
I tried setting it to 2GB and postgres wouldn't start.  Didn't
investigate in much greater detail as to why it wouldn't start, but
after switching it back to 1GB it started fine.

On 8/15/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
> See the recent thread about how old rules of thumb for shared_buffers
> are now completely bunk. With 4G of memory, setting shared_buffers to 2G
> could easily be reasonable. The OP really needs to test several
> different values with their actual workload and see what works best.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Next
From: "Carl Youngblood"
Date:
Subject: Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2