Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date
Msg-id e5538639-c232-e631-c533-aa6449b8ba09@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-01-19 01:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Thank you for the information. The only reason for sharing the same
> variable for both file and directory is to avoid additional variable
> only for this reason. I'll post a new version where new GUC
> ssl_crl_path is added.

Okay, I look forward to that patch.

> By the way we can do the same thing on CA file/dir, but I personally
> think that the benefit from the specify-by-directory for CA files is
> far less than CRL files. So I'm not going to do this for CA files for
> now.

Yeah, that seems not so commonly used.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: yuzuko
Date:
Subject: Re: Release SPI plans for referential integrity with DISCARD ALL
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: popcount