Re: NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Marko Kreen
Subject Re: NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id e51f66da0811270204h50e6bb82l6f87a782bb685fb3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL  (Fabricio <fabrixio1@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL  (Fabricio <fabrixio1@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On 11/27/08, Fabricio <fabrixio1@hotmail.com> wrote:
>  I have an IBM server with NUMA architecture, two nodes with 4 CPU quad core and 64 GB of RAM each, and PostgrSQL
8.3.5.
>
> Is there any way to avoid the performance degradation when the load goes up and used the two nodes?
>
> I understand this performance degradation is due to the higher latency than a cpu access a remote memory that the
localmemory. But there are ways to improve this? 
>
>  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-04/msg01187.php


You can use sched_setaffinity to select group of cpu-s for a process
and it's childs:

  http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/sched_setaffinity.2.html

There is a bit higher level concept of cpusets too:

  http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man7/cpuset.7.html

In both cases, you can either patch Postgres or write a launcher
that configures CPUs before executing postgres.

--
marko

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tino Schwarze
Date:
Subject: Re: NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL
Next
From: Vishal Arora
Date:
Subject: Re: PgAgent Job Scehduler is NOT running