On 9/21/08, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> > Good point -- I'll look into that and post something tomorrow. How does
> > "requirepassword" sound for the option? It is consistent with
> > "requiressl" but a bit long and hard to read. Maybe "require_password"?
>
>
> Well, no, because it's not requiring a password.
>
> Perhaps "ignore_pgpass"?
You need to ignore pg_service also. (And PGPASSWORD)
--
marko
