On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:43:48 +0000, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:
>> This is also the reason why the whole "pause recovery" idea is a
>> fruitless
>> path to wander down. The whole point of this feature is that people
>> have a
>> secondary server available for high-availability, *first and foremost*,
>> but
>> they'd like it to do something more interesting that leave it idle all
>> the
>> time. The idea that you can hold off on applying standby updates for
>> long
>> enough to run seriously long reports is completely at odds with the
idea
>> of
>> high-availability.
> I want my ability to run large batch queries without any performance
> or reliability impact on the primary server.
+1
I can use any number of other technologies for high availability.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
